THE IDEOLOGICAL STRUGGLE AGAINST ISRAEL

Israel’s response to the October 7 Hamas rampage has led to an unprecedented increase in public hostility. This hostility has been directed not only toward Israel’s military strategy of urban warfare, which, like any such strategy, has led inevitably to widespread death and destruction, but also toward the Jewish State itself. Much of this hostility can be attributed to plain old antisemitism.

At Princeton, the Near Eastern studies department offers a course whose reading list includes a book that claims that Israelis systematically maim Palestinians to harvest their organs.

At the University of Michigan, benches in front of the Hillel House have been defaced with the Star of David, followed by the equal sign, followed by the swastika.

At Harvard, visibly Jewish students have been jeered at and physically assaulted walking to class.

There have been countless other incidents of such run-of-the-mill antisemitism. Still, it would be a mistake to conclude that antisemitism alone undergirds the current hostility toward Israel. After all, some of this hostility comes from Jews themselves.

One of the most visible organizations criticizing Israel has been Jewish Voice for Peace. Commentary Magazine’s Eli Lake has even identified what he calls the “AsAJew” phenomenon, to describe the many Jewish anti-Israel activists who cite their religion to legitimize their tactics. Some of these activists may be fairly described as “self-hating” Jews – but they are Jews nonetheless.

To those who would stand up for Israel, it is important to look beyond antisemitism, and to recognize that hostility toward the Jewish State is also based on something different: the settler-colonial paradigm. According to this conceptual framework, the State of Israel is an illegitimate entity designed and populated by Europeans colonizers who invaded a foreign territory to exploit the indigenous people, and to impose their culture and religion on them. This paradigm views Israelis as comparable to the British settlers in Kenya or the French in Senegal or the Belgians in the Congo.

Continue reading

3 Comments

Filed under Culture, Foreign Policy

GOOGLE’S GEMINI COLLIDES WITH COPYRIGHT

Google’s disastrous launch of its Gemini AI program has been viewed as yet another skirmish in the long-running culture wars. Certainly, Gemini reflects the progressive biases of its Silicon Valley creators. But the debacle offers more than a lesson on the dangers of “woke-ism.” It also provides insight on the collision between AI and copyright, a subject this blog has examined before.

Before turning to the copyright issue, let’s explore what went wrong with the launch.

Google designed Gemini to compete with OpenAI’s ChatGPT, and other AI products.  Unlike its rivals, which generally deal with one type of prompt, Google designed Gemini to be “multimodal,” meaning that it could accept inputs in many different media, including text, images, audio, and video.

The Company boasted that Gemini outperformed its rival AI models across dozens of benchmarks including reading comprehension, mathematical ability, and multistep reasoning skills. But the fanfare surrounding its launch was quickly replaced by ridicule, as users tried it and discovered a number of glaring quirks.

A search for images of Nazi soldiers generated an absurd collage of racial inclusiveness.

(Gemini images republished by The Verge.)

Searches for pictures of Founding Fathers, Vikings, and popes –categories exclusively white — also generated multiracial images. But paradoxically, with no whites.

(Gemini images republished by Reason Magazine.)

In brief, Gemini produced results that looked like DEI on steroids.

Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under Culture, Law

ODIOUS UNRWA

Last week, news broke that 12 employees of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA), the agency tasked with providing assistance and protection for Palestinian refugees, were personally involved in the October 7 Hamas rampage.  One UNRWA employee was armed with an anti-tank missile; another filmed a hostage being taken captive; yet another, an elementary school teacher, served as a Hamas commander and participated in the massacre at Kibbutz Be’eri. Another UNRWA employee kidnapped an IDF’s soldier’s body.  (Corpses are valuable to Hamas because Israel is known to release large numbers of prisoners to secure the return of its soldiers’ remains.)

UNRWA’s involvement in the atrocities did not end on October 7. One of the hostages recently released from Gaza revealed that he was held captive in an attic in Gaza for nearly 50 days by a teacher employed by UNRWA.

A second even more disturbing report disclosed that 10% of UNRWA employees have ties to Hamas or the Palestinian Islamic Jihad; while about 50% are close relatives to people with ties to those terrorist organizations.

These reports, provided by the Israeli government, were deemed “highly, highly credible,” by U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken. Other governments agreed on the reports’ reliability. After their release, 15 nations suspended their financial contributions to UNRWA.

While the revelations may seem shocking, the most shocking thing about them is the fact that they shock. For anyone familiar with the history and performance of the agency should not have been surprised.

UNRWA Commissioner-General Philippe Lazzarini  insists that the agency is dedicated to “upholding the values of the United Nations” and that it conducts its business with “zero-tolerance policy for hatred.”

The first claim is actually true. UNRWA does uphold the values of the United Nations, an international body that regularly targets Israel for condemnation.  A few years ago, its General Assembly passed a resolution dismissing any Jewish connection to the Old City of Jerusalem.  A UN Special Rapporteur on Violence Against Women has blamed the tendency of Palestinian men to beat their wives on Israeli settlements. The Palestinian Authority’s UN delegation has blamed Israel for global warming. As Abba Eban, a former Israeli Foreign Minister, once quipped: “If Algeria introduced a resolution declaring that the earth was flat and that Israel had flattened it, it would pass by a vote of 164 to 13 with 26 abstentions.”

But the second part of Lazzarini’s statement – that UNRWA has “zero-tolerance for hatred” – is a lie. UNWRA was founded upon hatred of the State of Israel, and it has lived to up its disreputable origins ever since.

Continue reading

1 Comment

Filed under Foreign Policy

TRUMP SHOULD STAY ON THE BALLOT

Next month, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear argument on whether or not Donald Trump is qualified to appear on the ballot in Colorado. Disqualification challenges have become a weapon used by Trump’s opponents to stop him from regaining power. Outside Colorado, a disqualification challenge succeeded in Maine. Challenges in Michigan, Minnesota, and California have failed. But depending on the Court’s ruling, there could be more.

The Supreme Court acted sensibly in accepting the Colorado case on an expedited basis. It would be chaotic to have a presidential election decided by different states following different disqualification criteria. It would also be dangerous to our democratic system.

The Colorado case will focus national attention on Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which reads:

No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

The Court will confront a number of issues:

  Does this disqualification language apply to the President? Note that it specifically mentions “Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President.” It also refers broadly to “any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State.” But it does not specifically mention the presidency itself.

  What constitutes an “insurrection”? Is a violent riot, like the one that occurred on January 6, sufficient? Or must there be an armed and organized attempt to overthrow the government, like the Bolsheviks storming the Winter Palace or the Confederates bombarding Fort Sumter?

  What does it mean to have “engaged” in insurrection? Is cheering from the sidelines sufficient? Or must there be personal participation in the activity?

All of these issues present interesting, if arcane, legal issues, the kind lawyers and jurists love delving into and debating. But if it chooses, the Supreme Court can reject Colorado’s attempt to keep Trump off the ballot for two simple and straightforward reasons.

First, Colorado (and Maine) failed to provide Trump with anything even approaching the kind of due process to which he was entitled in this important matter. Second, the question of whether Trump should be disqualified for having engaged in insurrection has already been decided in a trial before the U.S. Senate presided over by the Chief Justice. And he was acquitted. Neither Colorado, nor Maine, nor any state, has the right to retry him.

Continue reading

6 Comments

Filed under Law, Politics

SHOULD AMERICA LECTURE ISRAEL?

The latest reports from the Gazan “Health Ministry” state that the death toll has topped 16,000.  Of course, such figures must be taken with a grain of salt. The “Health Ministry” officials work for Hamas, a terrorist organization which routinely lies.  Moreover, the number does not distinguish between Hamas soldiers and true civilians. Nor do the figures account for the inhabitants killed by Hamas’s or Islamic Jihad’s own rockets, 20% of which fall into Gaza.

But even allowing for exaggeration and fabrication, there is little doubt that the Gazan civilian death toll far exceeds the number of Israelis and other nationalities murdered by Hamas on October 7. This lack of “proportionality” has become a problem for the Biden administration. Its support for Israel, rock solid right after October 7, has softened and become more qualified as the toll increases.

On his third trip to the Middle East since the war began, Secretary of State Blinken declared that America’s support requires Israel’s “compliance with international humanitarian law.” He urged Israel “to take every possible measure to avoid civilian harm.”

Two days later, Vice President Harris issued a similar statement after a meeting with Egyptian President el-Sisi: “Too many innocent Palestinians have been killed,” she said. “Frankly, the scale of civilian suffering and the images coming from Gaza are devastating.”

Are these lectures deserved?

Continue reading

3 Comments

Filed under Foreign Policy

REMEMBER THE HOSTAGES

October 7 was the worst day in Jewish history since the Holocaust. But already, efforts are underway to diminish the horrors visited upon Israelis and others who were living in Israel on that day. Among those horrors was the taking of hostages.

A small group of New York City-based Israeli artists put together an unfunded #KidnappedfromIsrael campaign to circulate photographs of the hostages, along with their names and ages. (More on that below.) Many people have printed out these photographs and posted them in public places to focus attention on their plight. Almost as soon as the public awareness campaign started, a systematic counter-campaign arose, involving vandals tearing down the posters.

These posters depict 240 human beings held in captivity. Nearly all are civilians. Many are grandparents. At least 33 are children, including one 9-month old baby.

What kind of moral degenerate would wish to conceal the fact that innocent men, women, and children are being held captive in underground tunnels?

Unfortunately, there is a method to their madness. This concerted effort to erase the hostages’ predicament from public consciousness finds parallels in the efforts to deny the Holocaust.

In some parts of the world, Holocaust denial is official dogma. In much of the Arab world, hundreds of books denying the genocide are still sold, and sitcoms about the “fake Holocaust” have been hits in Egypt and the Gulf countries. Mahmoud Abbas, the leader of the West Bank Palestinians, does not completely deny the Holocaust occurred, but he contends that the real number of murdered Jews was only one sixth as large as claimed, and that this scaled-down Holocaust resulted from a collaboration between Zionists and Nazis, designed to spur Jewish immigration to Palestine. In other words, he asserts that the Jews helped orchestrate their own mass murder.

Outright Holocaust denial in the United States is restricted to the loonier fringes of the political spectrum, but a more passive form of denial emerges from widespread ignorance.

According to a 50-state survey conducted in 2020 based on 11,000 interviews of Millennials and Gen Z Americans, almost two-thirds of young adults do not know that 6 million Jews were killed during the Holocaust. About 36% believe that the real number was 2 million or fewer. More than one in 10 believe that Jews themselves caused the Holocaust. Almost half of the young Americans surveyed could not name a single concentration camp. Almost a quarter said that the Holocaust was a myth, or was exaggerated, or they weren’t sure.

It is tempting to view the tearing down of the posters as acts of adolescent petulance. But when you consider the woeful extent of Holocaust ignorance, tearing down the posters actually makes a sort of malevolent sense.  For an uneducated and gullible public, out of sight is out of mind.  

Sadly, the campaign may be succeeding, at least to an extent. Many of the hostages are Americans. In 1979, when Americans were held hostage in Iran, the media paid  constant attention to their situation. Ted Koppel became a star when ABC launched “America Held Hostage,” which ran every night, eventually transforming into “Nightline”.

Today, we hear little or nothing about the American hostages held by Hamas. Other than their family members, few if any of us know their names. We do not recognize their faces.

Ignorance is the ally of evil. If people do not know that two out of three of Europe’s Jews were exterminated in the Holocaust, they are less likely to recognize the evil of antisemitism. If people do not know that 240 men, women, and children, including babies, are being held captive, they are less likely to recognize how Hamas fosters the same type of evil.

The public should not forget the hostages, nor grow callous to the injustice of their captivity.

Below are the photographs gathered by the #KidnappedfromIsrael campaign. Their website is at https://www.kidnappedfromisrael.com/.  See them and bear witness.

Leave a comment

Filed under Foreign Policy

WHAT’S THE TRUTH BEHIND THE CHARGES AGAINST ISRAEL?

This post is a short primer on the Middle East. It is designed for the many typical Americans who have open minds and open hearts, but for whom Israel is not a constant concern. 

According to recent polling, the vast majority of such Americans believe that Israel is in the right and its enemies are in the wrong. But when they hear “experts” from think tanks, universities, and even some congressional offices, blaming Israel, they may not know how to respond.

This post collects many of the most commonly heard charges against Israel, and offers brief factual refutations. Then it includes links to other posts on this same website which provide more detailed information.

The Jews in Israel are “colonists” and “settlers,” who displaced the native people.

The Jews are the native people. Colonists and settlers establish colonies and settlements in regions in which they have never lived before, and to which they have no connection.  Jews are different. They have had a continuous presence in the Holy Land for more than 3,000 years, far longer than any Arab presence. Jews outside Israel in the Diaspora retain deep religious ties to Israel, constantly mentioning it in their prayers.

Want more facts? Go to https://toputitbluntly.com/2023/10/21/whats-the-truth-behind-the-charge-the-jews-in-israel-are-colonists-and-settlers-who-displaced-the-native-people/

Israel is an “apartheid” state.

Israel is a multi-ethnic nation, where Jews, Muslims, Christians, and Druze all enjoy equal civil rights. Arab Israelis make up 21% of the population and are fully integrated. They hold elected office and sit on Israel’s courts, including its Supreme Court. They even enlist in the IDF. It’s strange to hear people call Israel an “apartheid” state since a majority of Jewish Israelis trace their heritage to North Africa and the Middle East, and by some definitions would be considered “people of color.” And what kind of “apartheid” state would go to great lengths to rescue thousands of oppressed Ethiopian Jews from Africa to bring them to freedom in Israel?

Want more facts? Go to https://toputitbluntly.com/2023/10/21/whats-the-truth-behind-the-charge-israel-is-an-apartheid-state/

The founders of the State of Israel expelled the Arab residents, causing the refugee problem.

The founders did the opposite. They appealed to the Arab residents to stay. Israel’s War of Independence, like most wars, caused civilian dislocations. The roughly 800,000 Jews who were forced out of Arab countries are not considered refugees because they were welcomed in Israel, and soon became productive citizens. The comparable number of Arabs who fled Israel have never been fully integrated into the neighboring Arab counties, and instead have been consigned to squalid refugee camps.

Want more facts? Go to https://toputitbluntly.com/2023/10/21/whats-the-truth-behind-the-charge-the-founders-of-the-state-of-israel-expelled-the-arab-residents-causing-the-refugee-problem/

Israel refuses to let the Palestinians have a state of their own.

The Palestinians were offered a separate state of their own by the British in 1937, by the United Nations in 1947, and by the Israelis in 2000 and 2008. In each instance, they turned down the offer, rather than live as neighbors with a Jewish state. No wonder the late Israeli statesman Abba Eban once said: “The Palestinians never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity.”

Want more facts? Go to https://toputitbluntly.com/2023/10/21/whats-the-truth-behind-the-charge-israel-refuses-to-let-the-palestinians-have-a-state-of-their-own/

Hamas doesn’t hate Jews, it just hates Israel.

Hamas hates both. Its founding Covenant commands its followers to kill Jews, wherever they may be found. The butchery that occurred on October 7 was fully consistent with the organization’s Covenant.

Want more facts? Go to https://toputitbluntly.com/2023/10/22/whats-the-truth-behind-the-charge-hamas-doesnt-hate-jews-it-just-hates-israel/

The root cause of Hamas terrorism is Israel’s blockade of Gaza, which has turned Gaza into an open-air prison.

Hamas terrorists do not murder Israelis because Israel blockades Gaza. Israel blockades Gaza because Hamas terrorists murder Israelis. Israel disengaged from Gaza in 2005. Almost immediately, Hamas used Gaza as a launching pad from which to fire thousands of rockets at Israeli homes and schools. Hamas uses supplies intended for construction of homes to make rockets and to dig terror tunnels. Israel, along with Egypt, restricts the flow of goods into Gaza in an effort to prevent Hamas terrorism. Before October 7, if attacks from Gaza had stopped, these restrictions would have ended immediately

Want more facts? Go to  https://toputitbluntly.com/2023/10/21/whats-the-truth-behind-the-charge-the-root-cause-of-hamas-terrorism-is-israels-blockade-of-gaza-which-has-turned-gaza-into-an-open-air-prison/

Israel’s use of force violates international law because it is disproportionate.

Israel, like any nation, has the right to defend itself by using sufficient force to stop attacks on its people. That is what Israel has tried to do in Gaza ever since Hamas took over the territory and began using it as launching pad for attacks on Israeli homes and schools, while embedding its terror network in mosques, hospitals, and other civilian sites. The awful events of October 7 show that Israel has used less force, not more, than is required to prevent Hamas terrorist attacks.

Want more facts? Go to https://toputitbluntly.com/2023/10/21/whats-the-truth-behind-the-charge-israels-use-of-force-violates-international-law-because-it-is-disproportionate/

Israel’s use of force just creates a “cycle of violence.”

The “cycle of violence” theory assumes that Israel’s enemies resort to violence in response to Israeli acts of violence. But the October 7 Hamas terrorist attack was not a response to violence by Israel. The October 7 attack was a response to peacemaking efforts by Israel; namely, its efforts to make peace with Saudi Arabia. This has happened before. Yasser Arafat launched the violent 2000 Intifada, not in response to any attacks by Israel, but in response to American and Israeli peacemaking efforts at Camp David.

Want more facts? Go to https://toputitbluntly.com/2023/10/21/whats-the-truth-behind-the-charge-israels-use-of-force-just-creates-a-cycle-of-violence/

If Israel ceased to exist there would finally be peace in the Middle East.

The Middle East is the site of numerous wars – such as the civil wars in Yemen, Syria, and Sudan, and the Iran-Iraq War of 1980-1989 – which have nothing to do with Israel. If Israel ceased to exist, wars would continue throughout the Middle East.  One of those wars would likely be between Hamas and its Palestinian rival Fatah. They have already fought one war for control of Gaza. They would likely fight another for control of the place where Israel used to be.

Want more facts? Go to  https://toputitbluntly.com/2023/10/21/whats-the-truth-behind-the-charge-if-israel-ceased-to-exist-there-would-finally-be-peace-in-the-middle-east/

4 Comments

Filed under Foreign Policy

WHAT’S THE TRUTH BEHIND THE CHARGE: Hamas doesn’t hate Jews, it just hates Israel.

Hamas hates both.

Its founding Covenant declares:

Our struggle against the Jews is very great and very serious. It needs all sincere efforts. It is a step that inevitably should be followed by other steps. The Movement is but one squadron that should be supported by more and more squadrons from this vast Arab and Islamic world, until the enemy is vanquished and Allah’s victory is realized.

The Day of Judgement will not come about until Muslims fight the Jews. When the Jew will hide behind stones and trees, the stones and trees will say, “O Muslims, O Abdulla, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him.”

The day that enemies usurp part of Muslim land, Jihad becomes the individual duty of every Muslim. In face of the Jews’ usurpation of Palestine, it is compulsory that the banner of Jihad be raised.

Israel, Judaism and Jews challenge Islam and the Muslim people. “May the cowards never sleep.”

If there were any doubts of the antisemitic fervor of Hamas, the events of October 7 should dispel them. A movement that kills, burns, and mutilates women, the elderly, and babies does not intend merely to erase its opponent’s army and government. It intends to erase its people.

The deeds of Hamas are consistent with the language of its Covenant. Its goal is to eradicate Israel’s Jews in the same way the Nazis eradicated Europe’s Jews. But with one difference. The Nazis tried to keep their antisemitic murders secret. Hamas publicizes its antisemitic murders on social media.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

WHAT’S THE TRUTH BEHIND THE CHARGE: If Israel ceased to exist, there would finally be peace in the Middle East.

We hear so much about attacks on Israel, and Israel counterattacks on its foes, that it is easy to imagine that if Israel somehow ceased to exist, peace would finally come to the Middle East.

But the end of Israel would not mark the end of war.

Right now, brutal civil wars are raging in Yemen, Syria, and Sudan. The bloodiest Middle Eastern war in modern times was the Iran-Iraq War of 1980 -1988, which claimed at least one million lives.  None of these wars have or had anything to do with Israel.

In fact, if Israel ceased to exist tomorrow, its disappearance would cause a new war to break out … in the land which had formerly been Israel! This war would be between Hamas and Fatah for control of the abandoned territory.  These two Palestinian factions have already fought one war in 2007 for control of Gaza. In that vicious fight, both sides committed war crimes.  If Israel ceased to exist, Hamas and Fatah would likely fight another bloody war for control of the rest of the land.

The sad truth is that the Middle East is a violent neighborhood. Some Israelis may regret that Providence or Fate or both located their country there. But Israel’s disappearance would not bring about an end to war. It would just bring about the end of Israel.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

WHAT’S THE TRUTH BEHIND THE CHARGE: Israel’s use of force just creates a “cycle of violence.”

The “cycle of violence” theory rests on the notion that each side resorts to violence only in response to violent acts committed by its opponent. But the Hamas terrorist attack was not in response to violence by Israel. On the contrary, the October 7 attack was in response to peacemaking efforts by Israel. As President Biden stated, its purpose was to derail efforts to normalize relations between Israel and Saudi Arabia. Sadly, it appears to have succeeded.

There is nothing new in this strategy. Israel’s fiercest enemies have used violence, not in response to something Israel did, but as a weapon of first resort. It is a surefire method of gaining support for the terrorists. Yasser Arafat launched the 2000 Intifada, not in response to any attacks by Israel, but in response to American and Israeli peacemaking efforts at Camp David.

If Israel holds back out of fear of contributing to a “cycle of violence,” it will not avoid violence. It will just allow its enemies the freedom to choose where and when to inflict that violence.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized