Tag Archives: israel

GIVING TRUMP CREDIT WHEN DUE

One rarely thinks of “Profiles in Courage” when one thinks of Donald Trump.

Ordinarily, he does not evoke the image of a statesman rising above politics, to say what needs to be said regardless of its unpopularity. Instead, President Trump often appears petty and vindictive. Just ask his former advisor John Bolton, a man threatened for assassination by Iran. Bolton’s secret service protection was removed after he criticized Trump.

But give credit where it’s due. In the face of dropping popularity numbers, Trump has taken an unpopular position on a major issue, and he has refused to back down.

On May 12, on the eve of his trip to China, Trump was asked about the effect of bad economic news on his dealings with Iran. He said: “I don’t think about Americans’ financial situation… I think about one thing: we cannot let Iran have a nuclear weapon” Asked by a reporter how much the tough economic conditions are “motivating [him] to make a deal,” Trump responded: “Not even a little bit.” When pressed, Trump stood by his statement, insisting that “the most important thing by far is Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon….”

Democrats pounced on Trump’s remarks. Leah Leszczynski, spokesperson for the Democratic Party in Michigan, a battleground state, accused Trump of adopting the equivalent to “let them eat cake.”  

Republicans offered a tepid defense, claiming, in effect, that he didn’t mean what he said. Senator John Cornyn of Texas dismissed Trump’s statement as “just a sort of a throwaway line.” Senator Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming declined to comment “mostly because I think he actually does care.”

CNN purporting to rise above the fray, pronounced Trump’s remark a “gaffe.” As Michael Kinsley famously observed, a gaffe is a moment when a politician inadvertently says something truthful. Trump’s remark was not a gaffe because it wasn’t inadvertent. Trump believes what he said. On his return from China, Trump stood by his position.

Donald Trump is right to do so, no matter the political cost. Consider the world we would inhabit if Iran became a nuclear power.

Continue reading

1 Comment

Filed under Foreign Policy

THE MANIPULATION MYTH

As the war against Iran continues, a growing domestic chorus is proclaiming that the United States has been manipulated into fighting a war more in Israel’s interests than our own.

The loudest of such voices belong to those with impeccable anti-Semitic credentials.  Tucker Carlson warns that the U.S. is “tethered” to Israel, like a pet or a small child.  Marjorie Taylor Greene declares that MAGA has been supplanted by “Make Israel First.” The clear leader in the lunatic wing is Candace Owens, who asserts that Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk was killed “for this war.”

Like most conspiracy theories, the manipulation myth does not withstand scrutiny. The truth is that the United States is following the course of action which it deems best for itself. One may agree or disagree with this choice, but President Donald Trump is nobody’s fool. He is certainly nobody’s puppet.

This does not mean that American and Israel’s objectives are identical in every respect. The objectives of allies at war rarely are. America has a long history of waging war alongside allies with different, sometimes conflicting, interests. One can trace that history all the way back to the Revolution, which we fought alongside our oldest ally, France. The United States fought the Revolution to establish a free and independent republic based on individual rights. The French monarchy wasn’t particularly interested in such aims. It just wanted to win back some of the possessions it had lost to the British a few years earlier in the French and Indian War (known outside North America as the Seven Years War). But the alliance worked well for both parties.

The United States and Israel vary in population, location, size, and history. It would be astonishing if their war aims did not diverge to some extent. But most of the supposed differences tend to disappear upon close examination.

Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under Foreign Policy

THE IRANIAN OPPORTUNITY

Like a kitten dazzled by teaser toys, President Donald Trump is easily distracted. One day, he is obsessed with firing the Federal Reserve Governors. The next day, it’s getting his name on the Kennedy Center and the Institute of Peace. Then it’s the Nobel Peace Prize, which he supposedly deserved to win but didn’t. Then it’s Greenland. Or Iceland. He has trouble getting the name right.

For much of January, Trump was preoccupied with a topic of far greater importance: Iran.

Following mass demonstrations across the country, Trump, on January 2, threatened the mullahs with intervention if they resorted to violent suppression. “We are locked and loaded and ready to go,” he posted on Truth Social. He encouraged the protestors: “Iranian Patriots. KEEP PROTESTING – TAKE OVER YOUR INSTITUTIONS.” On January 13, he added: “HELP IS ON ITS WAY.”

But then new objects of fascination intruded, and it was time to scuff shiner objects.

Trump tried to rationalize the diversion by claiming that the regime had somehow moderated. “I greatly respect the fact that all scheduled hangings … have been cancelled by the leadership of Iran. Thank you!”

But this claim of mullah moderation was as untrue as it was unfortunate.

It was untrue. With the government shutdown of the internet, obtaining accurate numbers is very difficult, but it appears that the pace of killing continued unabated. On January 21, the Human Rights Activists News Agency announced that the death toll had risen to 4,560, and the number of arrests had risen to 26,500.

And it was unfortunate. The current unrest presents a real opportunity to finally topple the murderous mob that has misruled Iran since 1979 – but only if Trump can focus on the regime and the ways in which the United States might facilitate its overthrow. Failing to seize this opportunity because of trifling distractions would be a mistake of historic proportions.

Continue reading

1 Comment

Filed under Foreign Policy

THE LURE OF PALESTINIAN STATEHOOD

In the past few weeks, several Western countries have announced that they intend to recognize a Palestinian state. France led the way. On July 26, President Emmanuel Macron, in a letter posted on X, announced that France would recognize a Palestinian state when the UN General Assembly meets in September. Three days later, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer declared that his country too would extend recognition in September at the UN, unless Israel agreed to a cease fire, withdrew from Gaza, and halted West Bank settlements.  The next day, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a similar statement. Australia quickly followed suit. At the same time, New Zealand’s Foreign Minister Winston Peters announced that his country would make a formal decision in September. There is no doubt what that decision will be.

Each of these governments believes that recognizing a Palestinian state will advance the cause of peace in the Middle East. Each is wrong.

Continue reading

2 Comments

Filed under Foreign Policy

THE NEW KKK

On April 13, 2025, Cody Allen Balmer set fire to the residence of Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shaprio, while he and his family slept upstairs. That evening, the family had celebrated Passover, the Jewish holiday commemorating the liberation of the Hebrew people.

On May 21, 2025, Elias Rodriguez murdered Yaron Lischinsky and Sarah Milgrim, two young employees of the Israeli embassy who were about to be engaged to be married. They died outside the Capitol Jewish Museum, as they left a Young Diplomats events organized by the American Jewish Committee.

On June 1, 2025, Mohamed Sabry Soliman used a makeshift flamethrower and homemade Molotov cocktails in an attempt to incinerate Jewish community members in their weekly gathering to raise awareness of the plight of the hostages kidnapped by Hamas. He burned 15 people, one of them an 88-year old Holocaust survivor.

None of these murderers or would-be murderers concealed their motives. Balmer told the police: “Shapiro needs to know that [Balmer] … will not take part in his plans for what he wants to do to the Palestinian people.” He added: “You all know where to find me. I’m not hiding, and I will confess to everything that I had done.” Rodriguez proclaimed: “I did it for Palestine, I did it for Gaza …. ”  As the police took him into custody, he pulled out a red keffiyeh and chanted “Free, free Palestine!” Soliman yelled  “Free Palestine” during the attack and later told authorities that he wanted to “kill all Zionist people and wished they were all dead.”

Most pro-Palestinian demonstrators are not violent. But a minority are, and as recent events attest, they pose a real danger to the nation. Their violence has been compared to the lethal actions of the 1960s radicals, who resorted to assassination and bombs to protest the Vietnam War.

But there is another forerunner to today’s violent pro-Palestinian movement, one that not only constitutes a precedent, but may also provide guidance on how to counteract it.

That forerunner is the Ku Klux Klan.

Continue reading

2 Comments

Filed under Culture, Politics

HARVARD LOOKS IN THE MIRROR

Last week, Harvard’s Presidential Task Force on Combating Antisemitism and Anti-Israeli Bias issued its long awaited report. The Task Force was established in January 2024 by then-Interim President Alan Garber, and assigned to “identify causes of and contributing factors to anti-Jewish behaviors on campus; evaluate evidence regarding the characteristics and frequency of these behaviors; and recommend approaches to combat antisemitism and its impact on campus.”

There was much to identify, and it could be discovered by looking in the mirror.

Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under Culture

ONE CHEER FOR THE HOSTAGE DEAL

There is jubilation in Tel Aviv over the news of an apparent cease-fire and hostage-release agreement.

There is also jubilation in Gaza and Ramallah and Tehran (where the deal was hailed as a “victory”). Even the Houthis are celebrating.   

President Biden and President-elect Trump are competing to see who can claim more credit – a competition they may live to regret.

How can so many differing and hostile elements cheer for the same arrangement? Let’s be clear. This is a horrible deal. But to paraphrase Winston Churchill’s comment on democracy, this is the worst outcome to the war in Gaza except for all the other outcomes that have been considered.

Continue reading

1 Comment

Filed under Foreign Policy

JUST GO ALREADY!

“It is not fit that you should sit here any longer. You have sat here too long for any good you have been doing lately … In the name of God go.” Oliver Cromwell to the Long Parliament, 1653

This coming week, Bob Woodward’s latest book “War” will be released. It will feature several critical, profanity-laced remarks about Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu attributed to President Biden.

It will also remind us of why Oliver Cromwell’s famous words to the Long Parliament seem so apt today. Joe Biden has about 3 months left in office. He cannot go too soon. 

According to CNN, which obtained an advance copy, in the Spring of 2014, Biden privately remarked: “That son of a bitch, Bibi Netanyahu, he’s a bad guy. He’s a bad fucking guy!” He also referred to Netanyahu as a “fucking liar.”

“Bibi, what the fuck?” Biden yelled at Netanyahu in a July telephone conversation, according to Woodward’s book.

These examples of Biden’s penchant for – um, colorful – language, are not exactly news. Last February, Jonathan Martin of Politico reported that Biden called Netanyahu “a bad fucking guy.” Nor are they particularly newsworthy. American presidents dating back to George Washington have been known for voicing strong opinions in private.

A Rolling Stone article of a few year back recounts that President Obama referred to Mitt Romney as “a bullshitter” and Kanye West as “a jackass.” Vice President Dick Cheney advised Senator Patrick Leahy to “go fuck himself” after the two engaged in an argument over Cheney’s ties to Halliburton.  President Truman called General Douglas MacArthur a “dumb son of a bitch,” and he called Richard Nixon a “shifty-eyed goddamned liar.”  A recounting of President Nixon’s [expletive deleted] characterizations of his enemies would fill an encyclopedia.

What makes these recent Biden disclosures significant is the fact that, when judged in context, the remarks remind us of the incredibly poor judgment he has demonstrated throughout his career.

Continue reading

3 Comments

Filed under Foreign Policy

A NEW PAGE(R) IN HISTORY

By the brutal nature of war, urban battles always cause disproportionate civilian death tolls. When Rome suppressed the Great Jewish Revolt in 70 CE, they faced an army in Jerusalem of about 21,000 men. The civilian death toll has been estimated as between 600,000  (Tacitus) and over one million (Josephus). When the Red Army conquered Berlin in 1945, it faced a German force of about 45,000 soldiers.  Over 300,000 civilians died in the battle.

Since October 7, it has become almost routine in fashionable circles to accuse Israel of “genocide.” But the events of the past 48  hours show the opposite. In conducting its war against Hezbollah, a terrorist organization sworn to its destruction, Israel has accomplished a feat virtually unimaginable in the annals of military history. It has disabled or killed thousands of enemy combatants, in urban settings, deeply embedded within the local civilian population, with almost no civilian casualties.

On Tuesday, thousands of pagers exploded in Beirut and other locations in Lebanon and Syria, wounding about 2,800 people. Almost exactly 24 hours later, dozens of walkie-talkies exploded, injuring an additional 450 people.

Nearly every single victim was a soldier or member of Hezbollah. Well, not every victim. Iran’s ambassador to Lebanon was also wounded. He is not employed by Hezbollah. In fact, it would be more accurate to say that Hezbollah is employed by the ambassador. The fact that the Iranian ambassador was using a Hezbollah pager reveals much about Hezbollah’s status as an Iranian puppet.

Continue reading

2 Comments

Filed under Foreign Policy

SHOULD JEWS ABANDON THE IVIES?

Long before the Israeli armed forces moved into Gaza to destroy Hamas, in fact even while the Hamas murderers and rapists were still holding out in Israeli homes along the Gaza Envelope, top-tier American universities were the scenes of pro-Hamas protests, speeches, and encampments. Such deep-seated hostility toward Israel has caused many American Jews to ask: “Should Jews Abandon Ivy League Schools?” – as phrased in the headline of a Jerusalem Post interview of William Daroff, CEO of the Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish American Organizations.

The fear that our most prestigious universities are hostile environments, not only for Israel, but for Jews in general, was reinforced by the disastrous congressional hearings last December, where the Presidents of Harvard, MIT, and Penn were unable to say whether calls for the genocide of Jews would violate their schools’ conduct policies.

Is it time for American Jews to abandon elite universities and to look elsewhere for educational opportunities?  Several arguments have been advanced for doing just that.

Continue reading

2 Comments

Filed under Culture